Skip to main content

Table 2 Nature of evidence sought by global health investors

From: Holy grail or convenient excuse? Stakeholder perspectives on the role of health system strengthening evaluation in global health resource allocation

 

Nature of Evidence Requested

 

Impact of HSS Investments

Relative effectiveness of HSS investments

Implementation research, policy analysis & other forms of systems research

Rationale

• To demonstrate effectiveness (or lack thereof) of HSS investments in improving health outcomes

• To guide decision making between HSS investments versus other (e.g. disease specific) investments

To guide investment decisions within HSS (e.g. whether to target health information systems or health workforce strengthening)

To provide insight on how best to implement HSS strategies.

Methodological considerations

• Need to assess attribution or contribution of HSS to impact

• Evaluating complex bundles of HSS interventions that might address different health system building blocks

• Cost effectiveness analysis vis a vis other non-HSS investments.

• Affected by time frame – HSS investments may require longer time to impact and therefore require longer evaluation timeframes

• Cost effectiveness analysis of different types of HSS interventions

• Concerns about ability of health systems to absorb certain types of HSS investments

• Implementation research to address questions of “how” best to implement HSS

• Political economy analysis to assess and address resistance to HSS

• Approaches to integrating tacit knowledge into the evidence base